Crowd-sourced bias and accuracy ratings for the news you actually read. AllSides covers 600 outlets with 5 editors. We cover thousands — rated by readers.
Every "fact-check" today is one source telling you another source is wrong. You're still trusting a single authority to adjudicate truth. Sometimes that's appropriate; often it's not. In 2026, no panel of editors can review more than a fraction of one percent of what people actually read.
Web Jury flips the model. The crowd rates outlets — bias, accuracy, and overall trust — and the platform runs the math: trust-weighting per reviewer, temporal smoothing against brigading, full vote-distribution visibility so polarization isn't hidden behind an average. The result is a scoreboard that scales to the long tail of news without losing per-outlet granularity.
We're not a fact-checker. We're a credibility prior. When you read a story from CNN or Fox News, the Web Jury score doesn't tell you the story is right — it tells you what {N} readers across the political spectrum think about the source's track record. Use it as a starting filter, not a verdict.
A news article, an outlet, a YouTube channel, a Twitter account. We resolve it and load (or create) its review page.
Star rating, bias slider, accuracy radio, one sentence. Most reviews submit in under 30 seconds. Detailed reviews are opt-in.
Aggregated per-outlet trust, bias, and accuracy. Distribution histogram visible. No editor in the loop.
The news wedge is the priority, but the same infrastructure works for any creator with a public audience.
All reviews are public and verifiable.
Trust-weighted aggregation — reviewer track record affects vote weight.
Full vote distribution shown on every outlet page.
Open methodology — see the full methodology page.
No AI-generated reviews. AI is used only for sentiment + spam detection.
Free for readers. Free API for non-commercial use.
One sentence about an outlet you actually read. Under 30 seconds. Shapes the public score.